View Single Post
Old 06-16-2011, 01:47 PM   #31
CWatkinsNash
IOC Chief Archivist
CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
CWatkinsNash's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,950
Karma: 53868218
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fruitland Park, FL, USA
Device: Meebook M7, Paperwhite 2021, Fire HD 8+, Fire HD 10+, Lenovo Tab P12
Quote:
Originally Posted by RainingLemur View Post
Account sharing now against the law? I had heard about this happening with Netflix earlier this week... While it makes some sense, it still strikes me as stupid overall.
One thing to consider is that not only does each company have a different definition of what constitutes account sharing, the violation has to be pretty blatant to qualify. In other words, Amazon allows multiple devices that they KNOW are not all being used by one person. While it's not tested yet, it could be interpreted that Amazon has family-type sharing enabled and permitted because of the way it works, despite the legalese in the TOS. eBook clubs consisting of several non-related people would be seen as a violation.

iTunes allows multiple computers/devices. Napster allows multiple computers/devices (although I'm on an older plan and they've changed so it may not be true for newer accounts). Netflix allows access from multiple computers/devices...

Small-scale family or household-type sharing isn't really at risk, nor is it intended to be. They're after bigger fish. The state/local prosecution doesn't have the money to throw at "grey-area" cases. They're only going to spend money on the real problems.
CWatkinsNash is offline   Reply With Quote