[AGB]

I think I'll let the people reading your posts make that decision. To me it is obvious you said one thing, then changed your mind (and post) when countered, to finally arrive at the final opinion You did all this while simultanously playing a victim and more than implying that I was crap at my job and other such ad hominems.

Honest and clear is a joke. You first stated one thing, then changed it, then narrowed the scope on at least two fronts, all the while interspersing it with ad hominems and attemps to grant yourself victimhood.

Your posts reek of self importance. I don't care how many papers you have corrected, or that your first language is English, because that doesn't make the argument you made any more valid. If anything, it implies you ought to have been more specific when piecing together the argument.

You didn't even understand the sarcasm when I mentioned the tv presenter. It should have been an easy enough example to understand: You tried to argue that how I carried myself in this discussion would mean I was a lousy journalist. Thereby inferring that a journalist should act and write like he does professionally.

If we followed such an argument - not even to the extreme - you'd be arguing that tv-presenters should talk and behave as they do on the screen.
But as I said, it really shouldn't be hard to fathom for someone who toots his own horn as much as you do.