View Single Post
Old 06-14-2011, 03:47 PM   #21
TGS
Country Member
TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TGS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
TGS's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,058
Karma: 7676767
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Denmark
Device: Liseuse: Irex DR800. PRS 505 in the house, and the missus has an iPad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgaiser View Post
The author (and I agree) believes that the label Literary Fiction is being used to separate the Good Stuff™ from the great unwashed.

Just because it's labeled Literary Fiction doesn't make it good. Just because it's labeled as Genre Fiction doesn't necessarily make it bad.
Isn't the term being used to distinguish the "literary" from the "non-literary", (albeit sometimes mistakenly) - before one can say whether that equates to the good stuff and the not so good doesn't one have to answer the question, good for what? It is not a sign of anything to suggest that a painting by Mark Rothko has more artistic merit than a painting by Thomas Kinkade - neither is it a sign of anything to suggest that a novel by Iris Murdoch has more literary merit that a novel by Maeve Binchy. The literary philistines cannot have it both ways - to claim that literary fiction is rubbish and boring, whilst complaining that the term is used to separate the good stuff from the rubbish.
TGS is offline   Reply With Quote