Thread: Touch Kobo Touch Review
View Single Post
Old 06-13-2011, 09:11 PM   #73
witeowl
Hopeless Geek
witeowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.witeowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.witeowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.witeowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.witeowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.witeowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.witeowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.witeowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.witeowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.witeowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.witeowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
witeowl's Avatar
 
Posts: 119
Karma: 203608
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Reno, NV
Device: Nook Color (manual nooter)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rahulm View Post
Except you're all wrong.

It has the infrared touchscreen for your fingers. It's got a layer underneath the screen for the stylus (it's why the stylus does not work on other readers with the same infrared sensors).

LOL. Take that, Doogman. Facts.

Maybe if you people actually took two seconds to properly read someone's post instead of aggressively asserting your superior know-how, you might not have misunderstood me. I specifically mentioned "responds to the stylus" for a reason.
Source, please? My Sony responds to a wooden knitting needle just as well as its stylus. There's nothing special about the stylus. It's just a pen-like object that interrupts the beams, as far as I (and my knitting needle) can tell, so a stylus from a different device should work just as well as my knitting needle.

One of the benefits of the IR system is that there is no need for a layer underneath the screen (which was a downfall of the earlier Sony touchscreen ereader, because the additional layer makes the text fuzzy).
witeowl is offline   Reply With Quote