[spellbanisher]

Originally Posted by boswd

no you think your being civil but all your are doing is the typical "buy my product buy my product"

Nook bad
Kindle good

You're a kindle fan that's all good
I'm a nook fan, that's all good

but don't purposely post mis information, act like your ereader is all high mighty about it and not expect to be called out.

that's all

First off, I have posted videos and links to objective reviews. I am not selling "Kindles." As I have already noted

Originally Posted by spellbanisher

Now I have nothing against the Nook Touch. It looks like a very good reader, and if touch screen navigation is the most important thing to you and you really want a reader with this feature now that is cheap, then by all means buy a nook touch.

I am also a former nook owner, as I have already stated. The noted lack of civility on your part has nothing to do with your fondness for the nook. It has to do with your hasty generalizations like this:

Originally Posted by boswd

Just more misinformation from kindle owners. Seems to be SOP as of late.

Or the very disdainful way you communicate

Originally Posted by boswd

ust WOW.


What in Sam Hill are you talking about, you clearly don't know the features yet you post as if you do

*sigh*...

Next time spellbanish do a little research before writing super long posts, that'll save you some time and point out features you clearly don't know about. It doesn't take all that long.

As far as this little addition:

Originally Posted by boswd

And why do you keep comparing the features of the nook classic when it's about the STR.
Learn the features of the STR and then come back ok? The nook classic has nothing to do with this comparison.

Again, you fail on reading comprehension. Again, here is the thesis of what I wrote:

Originally Posted by spellbanisher

Barnes and Noble lacks attention to detail. To put it in another way, they do a half-ass job on their features just so they can say they have them. Let me give a few examples.

Note that my post was not about any specific device, nor was it about comparing the Nook Touch to the K3. It was about the B&N's lack of attention to detail in the features they provide, which indicates that they only tack on those features on their devices just to say they have them. Now, despite the title of this thread, the point of this thread was not to be a "nook owners vs kindle owners" thread. Instead, it was supposed to provide a fair comparison between the Nook Touch and the K3 so that buyers could make an informed decision, which is why I posted this in the "What Should I Buy" section, and not the General Discussions section. I was wrong about the search feature; you could have pointed that out without generalizing about kindle owners. What I resent is how you brought your whole bullshit "Nook owners vs kindle owners" squabble into this thread. I have no interest in such a petty discussion, and just to be noted, I have not posted in any other versus threads except for the sony vs nook touch thread, where I posted a video of a review comparing the nook and sony from the the-ebook-reader.com. Personally, I want there to be multiple successful ereaders, because more competition means lower prices and better features for all the readers. I think Sony makes the best readers(their problem is the store and the price, not the reader itself), and kobo has a decent basic reader, although they should probably lower the price a little more if they want to compete with B&N for marketshare. My problem, as I have repeatedly stated, is B&N's tendency to tack on features in a haphazard way just to say they have them, which I find to be a highly deceptive and unethical way to compete.