View Single Post
Old 06-09-2011, 11:19 AM   #8
ilovejedd
hopeless n00b
ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ilovejedd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ilovejedd's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,110
Karma: 19597086
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: in the middle of nowhere
Device: PW4, PW3, Libra H2O, iPad 10.5, iPad 11, iPad 12.9
Quote:
Originally Posted by jswinden View Post
But even using "Touch is incredibly short-sighted of B&N. First, Sony already has a Touch Reader named model, and has for a long time. Second, most new eInks from now own will have a touch interface, and using the term "Touch" in the name by itself will soon make no sense, if it even makes sense now.
I realize that soon it will make no sense but at this time, referring to it as the "Nook Touch" should be okay. Sony has it, Kobo will have it (Kobo Touch) so B&N might as well join the fray. For now, it's a good enough method to differentiate it from older models and it's easy to stick into people's mind. Nook STR sounds too technical for the average folk.

"Nook, 1st Edition" and "Nook, 2nd Edition" would probably be the best way to go about official naming. Easy to shorten, too - Nook 1 or Nook 1st Ed., Nook 2 or Nook 2nd Ed. Naming it the "All-New NOOK" is just dumb.
ilovejedd is offline   Reply With Quote