View Single Post
Old 06-08-2011, 02:29 PM   #7
anamardoll
Chasing Butterflies
anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
anamardoll's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,132
Karma: 5074169
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: American Southwest
Device: Uses batteries.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxaris View Post
Sometimes a writer has a specific meaning for using a font. Actually, in my library almost no book has build in fonts from the start.
I've had several library books come with embedded fonts -- they are almost always Charis, so I imagine the culprit is the publisher trying to standardize rather than the author wanting a certain effect.

I'm not immune to the argument that the author should have a say in how their product is presented, but font-choice is so personal. If you look at our Sans Serif / Serif poll, you'll see that some people find one or the other to be ABSOLUTELY EYES-BLEEDING UNREADABLE. Furthermore, there is some evidence that different disabilities (like dyslexia) may respond differently to certain fonts.

Given all that, I think it's perfectly acceptable that the author, well, not get to mandate what font their work is read in. They're welcome to make a suggestion, but personal need trumps authorial rights in this case, I think.
anamardoll is offline   Reply With Quote