View Single Post
Old 03-13-2008, 12:20 PM   #74
kfarmer
Gizzzzmo Nerd
kfarmer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kfarmer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kfarmer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kfarmer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kfarmer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kfarmer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kfarmer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kfarmer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kfarmer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kfarmer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kfarmer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 117
Karma: 1035585
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Device: Kindle, iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
There is a good reason to care. The choice of format might influence how much code you can reuse or get for free. The format should also be a format that have good support in form of parsers and a format that is easy to work with in different language. That is because the work done with formats and how to translate between them is generally useful if you want to implement something similar in another language.
Those are implementation details that only devs should be concerned about, not users, as the question was posed.

.....

Okay, so my still-waking eye inserted "users", but the point remains -- whatever canonical form that app uses has very *little* to do with interoperability, since interoperability is a function of what inputs are supported, and code reuse is not important to well-*functioning* code. Reuse is a convenience to the developer, not the user.

Last edited by kfarmer; 03-13-2008 at 12:25 PM. Reason: re-read
kfarmer is offline   Reply With Quote