View Single Post
Old 06-06-2011, 11:30 AM   #186
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,390
Karma: 68329346
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by astra View Post
Just because I sometimes use physical page-turn buttons instead of touch screen, it no way hints that I

Quote:
prefer non-touch for at least some purposes

It is only a nice, not a necessary, alternative to have for 20% of the ebbok reader usage.
While I honestly can't parse the semantics of that in a way consistent with my understanding of the meanings of the words, I am totally willing to allow that that is my own problem, and I totally accept that you do not prefer non-touch for at least some purposes. In fact, I don't think I've had any significant argument with much of anything you've said.
I voted in the same category as you, and I, personally, do prefer non-touch for at least some purposes . So it seems there is mix of opinion in the middle poll option, and a clear division on the ends in the two other option. I think that division of opinion is inherently valid. I'm spending time calling out people who repeatedly claim it's not.

I hope I've made myself clear enough this time as well.

Last edited by ApK; 06-06-2011 at 11:40 AM.
ApK is offline   Reply With Quote