View Single Post
Old 05-28-2011, 05:01 PM   #3
Caleb666
Zealot
Caleb666 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Caleb666 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Caleb666 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Caleb666 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Caleb666 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Caleb666 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Caleb666 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Caleb666 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Caleb666 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Caleb666 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Caleb666 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 101
Karma: 400000
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPad 2 64GB
Thanks for the calculations. I didn't think about calculating it like that

So I also looked at the Onyx Boox M90 (http://www.onyx-boox.com/onyx-boox-m90/specifications) and did the numbers:
The Onyx Boox M90/M91S is 9.7" with 16:11 aspect ratio (the screen is 1200 x 825) so the screen dimensions are roughly 8" x 5.5" = 44 sq in [20.32cm x 13.97cm].

Edit: Kindle DXG: 9.7" screen with 150:103 aspect ratio (the screen is 1200 x 824) so the screen dimension are 8" x 5.49" = 43.92 sq in [20.32cm x 13.94cm]. Basically the same as the Onyx M90.

iPad: 7.76" x 5.82" = 45.16 sq [19.71cm x 14.78cm]
Galaxy Tab 10.1: 8.56" x 5.35" = 45.82 sq in. [21.74cm x 13.58cm]

Of all the 3 so far, it seems that the iPad is the widest. I wonder how that affects reading in portrait mode? Although the difference between the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and the Kindle DX/Onyx M90 is pretty negligble.

Last edited by Caleb666; 05-28-2011 at 05:11 PM.
Caleb666 is offline   Reply With Quote