View Single Post
Old 05-28-2011, 11:28 AM   #111
ardeegee
Maratus speciosus butt
ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ardeegee's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,292
Karma: 1162698
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-350
Quote:
Originally Posted by jocampo View Post
The argument than pricey equals quality is a psychological one. That is not always true.
Also, I think there is an element of justification/fanboyism involved. You (and by "you" I mean "a buyer in general") like your Sony, but your Sony cost much more than almost every other reader on the market the same size-- so you try to find reasons to justify that price difference post-hoc. I see that aluminum prices fluctuate, but stay reasonably close to $1.00 a pound. I don't know what percentage of the PRS-650's 7.58 oz weight is the aluminum case, but let's be generous and call it 2 ounces. That means that-- at today's price-- there is around 15 cents worth of aluminum in the PRS-650. Let's be very generous and say that the actual process of mass-producing injection-molded aluminum cases is more expensive than that for mass-producing injection-molded plastic cases, and it brings the production cost difference between making a plastic-cased Sony and an aluminum-cased Sony to a whole $1.00. How does that $1.00 production cost difference translate into a $50 to $100 MSRP difference on the reader?
ardeegee is offline   Reply With Quote