View Single Post
Old 05-25-2011, 05:49 AM   #5
wannabee
Media Bloke
wannabee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wannabee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wannabee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wannabee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wannabee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wannabee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wannabee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wannabee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wannabee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wannabee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wannabee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,382
Karma: 113956855
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NSW - Australia
Device: iOS
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue_librarian View Post
But that's really the same thing. Within a book you say "see page 22", citing an external source I say "Nomen Nescio, Book Title (Dodge City, 2010), p. 22" (or whatever the style guide I'm using asks me to).



Laws, too (I'm a law librarian) where you quote article, section, subsection, paragraph, littera and what not. But these are specialist usage scenarios. I don't see that catching on in general literature.
I hear you . . . but I want someone to wave a magic wand and fix it.
c'mon... someone must have some suggestions!
wannabee is offline   Reply With Quote