View Single Post
Old 05-24-2011, 07:00 AM   #49
Algiedi
Overenthusiastic Noob
Algiedi has learned how to read e-booksAlgiedi has learned how to read e-booksAlgiedi has learned how to read e-booksAlgiedi has learned how to read e-booksAlgiedi has learned how to read e-booksAlgiedi has learned how to read e-booksAlgiedi has learned how to read e-books
 
Algiedi's Avatar
 
Posts: 69
Karma: 896
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: France
Device: Kindle 3
Somehow my carefully-crafted reply disappeared from my tabs just before I send it. Screw you, Gods of the Forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prestidigitweeze View Post
That sense of something in the air is a valid one, especially when we're young and have a (sometimes temporary) ability to intuit trends and innovations -- possibly because we're undistracted by the trajectory of our lengthy pasts.
I gotta say that I only recently got into that whole book meta-thought business, and I'm still easily distracted (and excited) by any and all innovations and possibilities ("oooh shinyyy").

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prestidigitweeze View Post
However, the writers I know are always saying things like that. The only ones who don't (in my personal experience) tend to be established science fiction writers.
I don't know what to make of that. Is it because they're already blasé about that whole "the X of tomorrow" concept?
(Frankly I've only talked to the one french science fiction writer that one could call "established" - we don't have many of those strange beasts around here )

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prestidigitweeze View Post
Any art that leaves out sensory input depends on you to fill it in. Fiction's drawback is also its virtue: it leaves out all of that input in the most direct fashion. We spent the past three decades moving away from leaving things out, only to discover that a segment of our culture longs for the exercise.

This is not meant to belittle any other art form or medium. Every art is reductive in a sense, and threads the dissonances of its silence with our minds' coherence.
Well that was quite well-put. (that makes me wanna work hard on my english writing skillz, I feel so inadequate)
I love it when walls-of-text are exchanged for ages only to realize in the end that we agreed in the first place.
I guess I just bristle very easily when arguments stray in that area, because the (true and objective) point you just made is usually coupled with a judgement of value that amounts to "images are for dumbasses therefore books are BETTAR", which is a logical fallacy on so many levels it boggles the mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prestidigitweeze View Post
I'll leave you to it, since that comment couldn't possibly be directed at me. You're addressing an argument I've never made in my life.
Yeah there's a couple of quotes and points in there that were from someone else. I should have put a divider between the two or something.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prestidigitweeze View Post
[lots of awesome stuff about video games]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prestidigitweeze View Post
Pity that, since I could talk about this all day.
You know what, screw books, let's just talk about video games
Algiedi is offline   Reply With Quote