Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant
It's only necessary to look at the paid circulation figures (down by over 7,000 in the past nine years, to just over 15,000 now) to see that something had to be done to save the magazine. It's already gone to bi-monthly publishing to save costs.
|
That should be enough to make it obvious that "If you don't have a Kindle, then read the paper version because we're going to cut you off from the electronic version you were reading" is a
bad idea. If people wanted to read the paper version, their circulation wouldn't have dropped by 7,000, now, would it?