View Single Post
Old 05-19-2011, 10:45 PM   #10
Prestidigitweeze
Fledgling Demagogue
Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Prestidigitweeze ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Prestidigitweeze's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,384
Karma: 31132263
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: White Plains
Device: Clara HD; Oasis 2; Aura HD; iPad Air; PRS-350; Galaxy S7.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andanzas View Post
Come on, SlowRain is not judging his work (actually he admits that Roth is good), he is just sharing his personal impression as a reader. Certainly one can do that without offending anyone, right?
(A) I'm responding to the link, which I included in my quote. A judge quit over the decision to honor Roth, spoke to the press and said rather emphatically that she disagreed with the decision because of her distaste for Roth's subject matter. Apparently, she thought Anne Tyler was a better writer.

(B) If "one" may offer personal reasons for finding Roth unpleasant without offending anyone else, then presumably I'm permitted to question someone else's logic without offending anyone, either.

(C) For the love of Millicent Oatquiver, I was not being entirely serious (hence the snicker of my esteemed colleague).

Last edited by Prestidigitweeze; 05-19-2011 at 11:24 PM.
Prestidigitweeze is offline   Reply With Quote