View Single Post
Old 05-18-2011, 07:25 AM   #194
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,645
Karma: 204624552
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe
The misleading thing is that you assume that it is the same artists that should make an income. Things change. For some artists this will be good for and for some it will be bad. So asking the question in a way that assume that exactly the same artists have to continue to earn the same amount of money is asking the wrong question.
The exact same artists DO have to continue earning the same anount of money. If you have any hope of convincing enough people that the abolition of copyright is a good enough idea to effect a wholesale paradigm change, that is.

So the question is very valid.

Last edited by DiapDealer; 05-18-2011 at 08:29 AM.
DiapDealer is online now   Reply With Quote