Quote:
Originally Posted by elcreative
From the discussion, it looks like it was an end of budgetary year "use it or lose it" deal where any funds not spent get reclaimed by parent organisation... usual stupidity but the real solution to this tends to be more in the political arena, if a group is funded then that's it but threatening reclaim if not spent by end of year results in things like this... at least, thanks to Neil, the money went into public usage as he donated to charity...
|
I agree. I've never understood public "use it or lose it" budgets. It's just silly.