View Single Post
Old 05-11-2011, 05:03 AM   #33
tubemonkey
monkey on the fringe
tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
tubemonkey's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,783
Karma: 158733736
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
Quote:
Originally Posted by HansTWN View Post
In my personal experience 5" is the ideal size -- at least given my idea that the best size is the biggest screen size that still fits into my pocket comfortably. If you make the bezel too small you have no way to hold it without activating the screen. Don't be fooled by the small difference in numbers, 5" is a whole lot bigger than 4" (a friend has a 4.3" screen and even when I see that I feel that I could never go back to such a tiny phone ).
Thanks for the info. Right now, I'm dealing with Apple's tiny 3.5" screen. I want bigger. I fear Samsung will drag their heels on a US release. As is, the technology is nearly a year old. The Galaxy S was released last June and the S II with a dual-core processor is already upon us.

Personally, I think Samsung waited too long to launch the S WiFis. They should launch the S II WiFis at this point. I mean, how difficult is it to leave a 3G/4G radio out of any smartphone and then market it as a player?
tubemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote