View Single Post
Old 05-08-2011, 01:49 PM   #172
cfrizz
Wizard
cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
cfrizz's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,573
Karma: 36389706
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Quincy, MA
Device: Samsung 54A, Kobo Libra H2O, Samsung S6 Lite
Thank you!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew H. View Post
You are confused. There is an important legal distinction between "obscenity," which is not protected by the first amendment, and "pornography," which absolutely is. (And then there is child porn, which is also not protected, but for a different reason - making it is directly harmful to the kids involved).

The "community standards" test is part of the legal definition of obscenity...but only one part of the test: even the most prudish community can't ban penthouse or even nude dancing establishments, regardless of local community standards.
cfrizz is offline   Reply With Quote