View Single Post
Old 05-08-2011, 12:49 PM   #171
Andrew H.
Grand Master of Flowers
Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,201
Karma: 8389072
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naptown
Device: Kindle PW, Kindle 3 (aka Keyboard), iPhone, iPad 3 (not for reading)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GA Russell View Post
To my knowledge, every time the US Supreme Court has ruled on this matter they have disagreed with you.
You are confused. There is an important legal distinction between "obscenity," which is not protected by the first amendment, and "pornography," which absolutely is. (And then there is child porn, which is also not protected, but for a different reason - making it is directly harmful to the kids involved).

The "community standards" test is part of the legal definition of obscenity...but only one part of the test: even the most prudish community can't ban penthouse or even nude dancing establishments, regardless of local community standards.
Andrew H. is offline   Reply With Quote