|
Once again, this is dealing with supposed CHILD porn which does violate community standards as well as the law. But since it computer generated images was of a 17 year old, & we all know that a lot of 17 year old kids are having sex.
Porn exist, always has alway will. But unless it involves children, no one is going to waste tax payers money on trying adult porn cases. That includes your little town in NC which based on Google has NO problem with adult entertainment.
Or to put it another way, adult porn does NOT violate community standards in the USA, only uptight individuals who need to get a life.
Child porn violates community standards & the law & rightfully so, and should be prosecuted.
"Writing for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy said key provisions of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 were "overbroad" and infringed on established protections of material with artistic value that does not violate community standards.
"Pictures of what appear to be a 17-year-old engaging in sexually explicit activity do not in every case contravene community standards," the court said."
|