View Single Post
Old 02-24-2008, 09:44 AM   #3
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhbailey View Post
Are you sure that's public domain? Anything published in the U.S. in 1959 would have been in its first period of copyright (28 years) when the copyright laws were rewritten in 1978 to give such works a single copyright period of 75 years, which was subsequently extended to 95 years under the Sonny Bono act.

The only way such a story would be public domain, at least in the U.S. would be if the copyright holder specifically placed it in the public domain.
Project Gutenberg thinks it's PD: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/23892

I don't believe the changes in copyright laws were retroactive. If the author or author's estate didn't specifically renew, PD it is.
______
Dennis
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote