Thread: Reviews
View Single Post
Old 02-24-2008, 09:15 AM   #3
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
What is a "reliable" review? If you don't like a book, does it mean that I won't like it (or vice versa)? I can't stand reading books with poor grammar; perhaps it doesn't bother you. I'm just not sure that I really see the value of reviews, unless it is simply to make factual statements about this like the book having poor grammar, or things like that.
How do you determine what new books might be worth your attention?

I read a fair number of reviews, and reliability is a function of the reviewer.

The best reviews for me are those in which the reviewers tastes and biases are clearly stated. Even a negative review can be a positive indicator when that's clear, in the cases of "X hated it, which means I'll love it!"

If I were to undertake reviews, mine would all be positive. There are scads of bad books published. I'd rather spend my time recommending stuff I found worth reading than warning people off the failures.
______
Dennis
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote