View Single Post
Old 05-05-2011, 06:14 PM   #54
mldavis2
Coffee Nut
mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mldavis2's Avatar
 
Posts: 410
Karma: 298350
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Missouri
Device: Kindle 3; K4PC; Calibre
Quote:
Originally Posted by queentess View Post
I'm stunned by the number of people (not just you) who think text messaging has "eroded" reading skills.
Don't mean to incite an argument here, just explaining what I think I'm seeing. First, 'reading' and sending text messages is hardly in the same category as reading War and Peace. True, one must have some command of the language in order to then learn the abbreviated vernacular, but the whole idea of texting is short, quick communication. I don't see text messaging as having much at all to do with reading skills which require assimilation of often complex phrasing and extended sentence structure.

My reference to 'instant gratification' was similarly intended to compare the banality of phrasing, brevity of communication skills and subsequent time needed, in comparison (again) with reading War and Peace. Yes, being able to instantly (well, maybe in a minute or three) download War and Peace is quite different from taking the extended time to read and understand it.

No argument here, just clarifying my intent with the post.
mldavis2 is offline   Reply With Quote