Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe
That was not my reasoning. The fault in you resoning was that they fail because they are small. They fail for the same reason that big players like Motorola fail.
|
They don't have NEAR the resourced required to put together a credible iPad competitor.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe
Of course. But why is this relevant? I thought you talked about failing relative to their goals. And their goal was not to sell as much as Apple. I think their goal was that for a lot of people to be a serious alternative and to be a serious alternative in the Andoid tablet market.
|
Are you kidding? The Adam was the next messiah, this amazing tablet that was going to wipe iPad off the floor. People were DROOLING over the damn thing which was never more than specs listed on the internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe
A good product is not the same as being able to sell millions of them. Of course a small company can make a very good product and a big company can make a very bad product.
|
They didn't even manage the "good product" part. Did not manage the "amazing best of both worlds screens" part. Did not deliver amazing battery life. Did not deliver amazing anything. Did not deliver anything until more than a year after they said they would. It's been a HUGE joke.
Lee