View Single Post
Old 05-01-2011, 03:07 AM   #33
grumpy3b
Banned
grumpy3b is less competitive than you.grumpy3b is less competitive than you.grumpy3b is less competitive than you.grumpy3b is less competitive than you.grumpy3b is less competitive than you.grumpy3b is less competitive than you.grumpy3b is less competitive than you.grumpy3b is less competitive than you.grumpy3b is less competitive than you.grumpy3b is less competitive than you.grumpy3b is less competitive than you.
 
Posts: 246
Karma: 14967
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: Kindle 2 (x2), Kindle 1, a couple old PDAs
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
The problem is that with a shared resource like ADSL it only takes a very small proportion of selfish users to degrade performance for everyone. For example, when my ISP here in the UK introduced a usage cap they reported that 0.1% of their users were using over 50% of their network bandwidth. It's only fair that high volume downloaders should pay more - it is a limited resource.
ADSL is provisioned and guaranteed bandwidth not shared. Cable is actually the shared and can vary over the course of a day. If you are trying to assert that ADSL is a shared resource simply because of the commonality of the DSLAM or other network control devices, well sure so is any other form of networking.

Now if there was a change in the ADSL topology in the past decade I must have missed it.
grumpy3b is offline   Reply With Quote