View Single Post
Old 04-28-2011, 11:54 AM   #17
Dave_S
What Title ?
Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,325
Karma: 1856232
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bavaria Germany
Device: Sony Experia Z Ultra
Quote:
Originally Posted by RAH View Post
So Dave, as I understand it, you are saying it is an operating system issue, not the fault of lazy app developers - i.e. the Android 2.2 OS doesn't permit them access to the Nook's internal memory.




I don't doubt what you are saying at all. If this is the case, of course, it would mean that we'd have to wait till the Nook gets a higher or different version of Android before this was fixed.
Actually, I do not think that the OS prevents an app from seeing the internal media storage memory. After all, the B&N apps can see and use the internal media storage. But apps that were not specifically developed for the Nook are probably not set up to see any media storage except SD cards, since that is how the Android smartphones are set up. I think that when apps are ported to a tablet OS like Android 3.0 then other media storage options will have to be coded into the apps. If B&N wants current apps to use Nook's internal media storage, then I think they will need to convince developer's to add code to access Nook's internal media storage. That is just my opinion of course.
[/QUOTE]
Dave_S is offline   Reply With Quote