View Single Post
Old 04-22-2011, 09:51 AM   #122
faithbw
Guru
faithbw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.faithbw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.faithbw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.faithbw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.faithbw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.faithbw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.faithbw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.faithbw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.faithbw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.faithbw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.faithbw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
faithbw's Avatar
 
Posts: 618
Karma: 1526148
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: A place where the sun always shines
Device: Kindle Oasis, iPad Mini 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by bZkindle View Post
There's quite a bit of overlap between books that are 'critically acclaimed' and 'classics', wouldn't you say?
After all, 'classics' are by necessity 'critically acclaimed'.
Again, that wasn't my point and I'm not sure why you're bringing up classics. A book can be critically acclaimed and not be a classic. For instance, a book I mentioned earlier in this thread, Minaret, has been critically acclaimed in Britain and the author, Leila Aboulela, has written critically acclaimed works ranging from short stories to novels. I wouldn't say her works are classics in the sense we're talking about. Maybe they'll become classics but who knows. Also, some works that we consider classics now, weren't critically acclaimed, at least when they were first written. Jane Austen's works didn't become critically acclaimed until long after her death.




Quote:
It was rhetorical.
Yeah, I got that. It was also insulting and belittling.
faithbw is offline   Reply With Quote