View Single Post
Old 04-20-2011, 02:38 PM   #78
MrsJoseph
Loves Ellipsis...
MrsJoseph ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MrsJoseph ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MrsJoseph ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MrsJoseph ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MrsJoseph ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MrsJoseph ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MrsJoseph ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MrsJoseph ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MrsJoseph ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MrsJoseph ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MrsJoseph ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
MrsJoseph's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,554
Karma: 7899232
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Device: Kobo Wifi (broken), nook STR (returned), Kobo Touch, Sony T1
Quote:
Originally Posted by bZkindle View Post
IMO, it's better to read to be edified rather than entertained. No one will be 'well read' by reading the 'Twilight' trilogy or Dan Brown books.
I don't read much contemporary fiction. Too much of it is derivative and watered-down; not much different than television.
Your statement here is extremely condescending.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bZkindle View Post
haha. alrighty then!
Brown and Twilight are mere examples. There are others, as well as many exceptions.
I never stated that I don't read contemporary literature. I do.
I never stated that it's all 'derivative and watered-down', only that "too much" of it is.
Your criticism makes no sense.

Oh and by the way, you're talking to an huge Philip K. Dick fan here, so perhaps you should put your brush away.
I think that –based upon the statement that I was replying to – my criticism makes perfect sense.

And you’re the one making broad generalizations about a large portion of the books being read by the general public.
MrsJoseph is offline   Reply With Quote