View Single Post
Old 04-20-2011, 07:49 AM   #46
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giggleton View Post
But to answer your question, the interested parties could also be the set of all users, any controversial review would be flagged by a user and then responded to. If a user flags reviews repeatedly which ultimately should not have been flagged, determined by the votes of the interested parties, the original review flagger would lose their review flagging privileges and possibly monies from affiliate sales, if referrer tracking on books was enabled and I think that it should be.
This is known as the tyranny of the majority.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote