View Single Post
Old 04-18-2011, 06:45 PM   #260
CallOfCth'reader
Cultist
CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
CallOfCth'reader's Avatar
 
Posts: 196
Karma: 8624438
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Device: Sony PRS 505, Kobo Mini, Kobo Glo, Kobo Forma, Kindle DX
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
And the point you seem to be missing is that here is nothing obvious with that the e-book price should have a specific relation to the paper book price. An e-book is more useful since it is searchable and you can annotate and share annotations. Why does that not motivate that the e-book is more valuable and therefore have a higher price than the paper book?
I don't search ebooks, annotate them, nor share said annotations, therefore the ability to do so adds zero value for me. I can also annotate pbooks, but I don't do that either, and neither do I factor that ability in when considering its potential worth to me.

People have different methods of determining worth. Personally, an electronic file (an ebook) has less intrinsic value to me than a solid object (a pbook).
CallOfCth'reader is offline   Reply With Quote