View Single Post
Old 02-11-2008, 04:09 AM   #6
kacir
Wizard
kacir ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kacir ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kacir ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kacir ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kacir ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kacir ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kacir ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kacir ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kacir ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kacir ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kacir ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
kacir's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,463
Karma: 10684861
Join Date: May 2006
Device: PocketBook 360, before it was Sony Reader, cassiopeia A-20
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexqwerty159 View Post
To continue a little on the font/delay trade off, why is it that the libprs-500 embedded fonts look so much better ?
because of hinting. See below.

My personal preference is to use built-in sans-serif font.
So I create an rtf file of the book I wish to read. In rtf file I set:
- page margins to 0.01
- font to some generic sans-serif (like helvetica or arial), size 16
- intendation for the lines to some value like 0.5cm

Explanation:

- page margins to 0.01 - so I can cram as much text on the page as possible. It really doesn't make sense to have margins on a small display. Margins are leftovers from the time books were typeset for printing. It is much like the first cars were resembling a horse buggy without a horse

- font to some generic sans-serif (like helvetica arial), size 16 so the reader uses its built-in sans-serif font. Again, a serif font is much more readable than sans-serif in a *printed* book. For a low resolution display sans-serif is much, much more readable. Please notice that even *this* text, just like the vast majority of text on a well designed web sites, is sans-serif See wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serif_font
Quote from wikipedia:
While in print serifed fonts are considered more readable, sans-serif is considered more legible on computer screens.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sans-serif
Quote from wikipedia:
Sans-serif fonts have become the de facto standard for body text on-screen, especially online. It has been suggested that this is because the small size of the font causes serif fonts to appear excessively cluttered on the screen.

- intendation for the lines to some value like 0.5cm so you can see where paragraph begins without having to have large space between paragraphs.

in Sony Reader PRS500 the built-in sans-serif font is heavily hinted, so it has a very nice, well defined, high contrast "crisp" outlines. Please see hinting at wikipedia for explanatioon http://en.wikipedia.rg/wiki/Hinting
quote from wikipedia:
One aspect of TrueType hinting is grid-fitting, which modifies the height and width of font characters to line up to the set pixel grid of screen display.

Last edited by kacir; 02-11-2008 at 04:12 AM.
kacir is offline   Reply With Quote