View Single Post
Old 04-07-2011, 09:38 AM   #39
mr ploppy
Feral Underclass
mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mr ploppy's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,622
Karma: 26821535
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Yorkshire, tha noz
Device: 2nd hand paperback
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
Making copyright infringement a criminal offence is exactly what the RIAA and MPAA want! That way they won't have to pay for the prosecutions, and can disclaim responsibility of the fines and other punishments.

One of the problems is that the statutory damages were set assuming that the infringer was doing the infringing commercially and on a large scale. They are completely disproportionate for small-scale non-commercial infringement.
Making it a criminal case will fix that. Can you imagine the outcry the first time someone gets a bigger fine for downloading an mp3 than someone gets for mugging an old lady or something else that people actually care about? At worst the downloader would get a small fine they could pay off monthly, and most likely just a warning for a first offence.

In the UK there has been a few attempts to prosecute people for this sort of thing, but they tried to call it "fraud" instead of copyright infringement and obviously they failed to get a conviction for that reason.
mr ploppy is offline   Reply With Quote