View Single Post
Old 04-06-2011, 11:16 AM   #8
tubemonkey
monkey on the fringe
tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
tubemonkey's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,783
Karma: 158733736
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Lyle Jordan View Post
I agree on the latter point: Innovation does not have to depend on copywritten works; but obviously there are some areas where it does, at least to some extent (as in the example mentioned in the article), and raises the possibility of important work not being done properly, or at all, if a legal minefield of irregular and unpredictable copyright penalties scares people off.
The example being the photos from Scripps. If the photos aren't being used for financial gain, can't they display them under Fair Use? If a copyright holder appears, then the photo(s) can be removed. No harm. What about laws for orphaned works? do they exist? and what's the procedure?
tubemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote