Thread: Seriousness Richard Branson Buys Pluto
View Single Post
Old 04-04-2011, 01:26 PM   #5
laurele
Junior Member
laurele shares his or her toyslaurele shares his or her toyslaurele shares his or her toyslaurele shares his or her toyslaurele shares his or her toyslaurele shares his or her toyslaurele shares his or her toyslaurele shares his or her toyslaurele shares his or her toyslaurele shares his or her toyslaurele shares his or her toys
 
Posts: 4
Karma: 5994
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Highland Park, NJ
Device: none
Pluto isn't a "former planet."

Better Branson than the IAU. Pluto is a planet, always was, always will be. Please do not blindly accept the controversial demotion of Pluto, which was done by only four percent of the International Astronomical Union, most of whom are not planetary scientists. Their decision was immediately opposed in a formal petition by hundreds of professional astronomers led by Dr. Alan Stern, Principal Investigator of NASA’s New Horizons mission to Pluto. Stern and like-minded scientists favor a broader planet definition that includes any non-self-luminous spheroidal body in orbit around a star. The spherical part is important because objects become spherical when they attain a state known as hydrostatic equilibrium, meaning they are large enough for their own gravity to pull them into a round shape. This is a characteristic of planets and not of shapeless asteroids and Kuiper Belt Objects. Pluto meets this criterion and is therefore a planet.
laurele is offline   Reply With Quote