Quote:
Originally Posted by ApK
Yes, but in that thread all you said on the matter was:
I have researched it a bit, and I have not yet found a blanket justification for it.
Until it's found and cited, I think there is enough other justification to discuss without relying on that.
It's causing a "repetitive stress injury." Every time it's repeated, lots of folks get stressed.
ApK
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piper_
KK, I'm glad. Forgive us for being confused, but your posts are somewhat cryptic!
So when you say, "the case law which has been discussed dealt with borrowed library books up to an including photcopying the entire book and retaining it for personal use."
...you are not saying the case law or anyone in that thread said it was ok to photocopy the entire book and retaining it for personal use... correct?
No one on the thread in question said it was, so I doubt you are - I just want it clear for the viewers, so to speak.
|
read the quoted case law
work calls... later folks