There are so many vagaries involved in the decision...
Quote:
|
Swedes are not allowed to own or intentionally look at drawn images of non-real characters that a court could determine might to some people resemble child-like figures in situations that for some could be sexually arousing. (my emphasis)
|
...that it's hard to believe they could bring the decision at all.
If this could happen, then I could see the same society convicting the owner of
A Clockwork Orange of similar indiscretions or violations of the law. The differences are largely subjective (as is the decision), and depend wholly on the society in question.
But as I said, the vagaries of the decision would upset me greatly, and if I were a Swedish citizen I'd want to demand greater clarity and detail to bolster that argument (or at least to make clear what would violate it).