View Single Post
Old 04-01-2011, 06:04 PM   #213
mr ploppy
Feral Underclass
mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mr ploppy's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,622
Karma: 26821535
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Yorkshire, tha noz
Device: 2nd hand paperback
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
An IP address is prima facie evidence. Not perhaps definitive proof, but evidence, none the less. And it's exactly the same evidence that, under previous legislation, a rights-holder could have gone to court with to request a court order for the ISP to release personal information about the account holder. Indeed, that's still what has to happen if the rights-holder wishes to instigate legal procedings against the alleged offender.

Despite your protestations, nothing has changed here, in terms of the standard of proof. There is still an assumption of innocence, and a rights-holder still has to go to court, and present evidence of wrong-doing to that court, before any "punishment" will take place.
Only until piracy fails to drop by 70%. Which it obviously won't do.
mr ploppy is offline   Reply With Quote