Quote:
Originally Posted by ardeegee
I'm utterly clear on the scientific consensus on the extent of glaciation during the Pleistocene. All that is confusing is that someone who attempts to be a rational thinker is clinging to an incorrect idea, apparently for no other reason than having a d**k-measuring contest. You are acting like a creationist here.
If you have data that disproves the accepted maps of glacial extents during the Pleistocene, I'm sure that the geologists would love to hear from you.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/glaciation.html
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/paleo/peltice.pl
http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/faculty/lemk...tribution.html (section D)
No matter how much you plug your fingers in your ears and go la-la-la, I will continue to be not wrong on this. |
Feel free to believe what you like, you clearly do. The fact is that their is significant contraversy both about clovis (which I remind you is the topic under discussion) and about the Bering land bridge as well. You clearly believe you know exactly what happened, but you don't.
See, you really do have a lot to learn as your behavior here indicates. Please work on it.
P.S. Please note that none of your maps even display the area under discussion (the Bering Land Bridge) What the hell kind of evidence do you that that is? And maps (as I've said) mean nothing. The closest thing that means anything might be the ocean floor samples of the area under discussion and the link I posted clearly indicates controversy wrt that.