View Single Post
Old 03-29-2011, 09:01 PM   #63
ardeegee
Maratus speciosus butt
ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ardeegee's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,292
Karma: 1162698
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-350
Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyc View Post
GO AWAY. SHOUTING DOESN'T MAKE SOMETHING TRUE. YOU ARE CONFUSED. UNWILLING TO ADMIT THAT YOU MIGHT BE WRONG.
I'm utterly clear on the scientific consensus on the extent of glaciation during the Pleistocene. All that is confusing is that someone who attempts to be a rational thinker is clinging to an incorrect idea, apparently for no other reason than having a d**k-measuring contest. You are acting like a creationist here.

If you have data that disproves the accepted maps of glacial extents during the Pleistocene, I'm sure that the geologists would love to hear from you.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/glaciation.html

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/paleo/peltice.pl

http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/faculty/lemk...tribution.html (section D)

No matter how much you plug your fingers in your ears and go la-la-la, I will continue to be not wrong on this.
ardeegee is offline   Reply With Quote