View Single Post
Old 03-29-2011, 07:56 PM   #52
ardeegee
Maratus speciosus butt
ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ardeegee's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,292
Karma: 1162698
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-350
Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyc View Post
I don't think that is proof. As I said this is all very contraversial. One theory does not constitute proof.
And I think you are confused about what I am talking about. I am not talking about the "Clovis ancestors traveling over Beringia" hypothesis-- I'm talking about the extent of glaciation at the time-- and that isn't a "controversial theory", that is a matter of the geological record.

THE ICE SHEET DID NOT COVER BERINGIA.

http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&q...w=1440&bih=725
ardeegee is offline   Reply With Quote