Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
I was talking about the situation where a person deliberately leaves their WiFi unsecured as a form of immunity from prosecution, should they be caught. This seems very wrong to me.
|
There are very good reasons to have unsecured WiFi. It is much more convenient for your friends to use it. So it is a deliberate act with a known side effect of possible immunity from prosecution. Do you mean that you should not be able to conveinently give your guests WiFi network?