Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
This seems very wrong to me ...
|
So to sum up:
- This law has been drafted by the corporations most likely to profit from it
- It's impossible to prove anyone's guilt using the method they've suggested
- Those most likely to suffer wrongful imprisonment are the computer illiterate
- Most of the population don't even see downloading as a crime
- You currently have 20 people disagreeing with you and only 1 person agreeing
- And even that person didn't think this should become a law
Why don't we just agree to disagree or is there some profit to you endlessly repeating your point of view to an audience that doesn't agree with you?