View Single Post
Old 03-28-2011, 03:49 PM   #144
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
So you're suggesting that if someone is suspected of copyright infringement, then, rather than sending them a warning letter politely requesting them to stop, there should be a raid on their home and seizure of all their computer equipment?

I hope you'll forgive me for saying that I regard the first approach as rather less "invasive".
I don't think that that is the step being complained of.
It is either when your internet access gets disabled or when you are sued, with the process being legitimised by the new legislation.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote