View Single Post
Old 03-28-2011, 08:42 AM   #136
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr ploppy View Post
The ISP will only know what went to that IP address, they would have no way of knowing if it was a drive-by downloader or a cloned modem or not.

But what happens when someone doesn't own up to a different crime? Do they prosecute the entire family or look for further evidence until they can prove which one it was?
Well, as I've said before, in the case of a speeding offence, the registered keeper of the vehicle will get fined. I have looked at the pictures taken on the two occasions when I've had speeding tickets, and in neither was the driver visible.

Guilt in a civil case is on the balance of probabilities. If evidence can be produced to show that a downloaded file was sent to a particular IP address, and the ISP shows that that IP address was assigned to Mr. Smith at the time that the time was downloaded, then a reasonable person would conclude that either Mr. Smith or someone in his household did indeed, on the balance of probabilities, download that file. I really do not see how this can be denied.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote