View Single Post
Old 03-28-2011, 08:27 AM   #135
mr ploppy
Feral Underclass
mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mr ploppy's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,622
Karma: 26821535
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Yorkshire, tha noz
Device: 2nd hand paperback
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Sorry, I think we're talking slightly at cross-purposes. I am referring to the case where there is clear evidence that a download has occurred via someone's internet connection (eg via evidence provided by an ISP), but that nobody in the household will admit to doing it. What should be done in that case? The evidence is there, but nobody will own up to it.
The ISP will only know what went to that IP address, they would have no way of knowing if it was a drive-by downloader or a cloned modem or not.

But what happens when someone doesn't own up to a different crime? Do they prosecute the entire family or look for further evidence until they can prove which one it was?
mr ploppy is offline   Reply With Quote