View Single Post
Old 03-28-2011, 07:53 AM   #133
mr ploppy
Feral Underclass
mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mr ploppy's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,622
Karma: 26821535
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Yorkshire, tha noz
Device: 2nd hand paperback
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
If it's a "family" internet connection, whom do you prosecute if nobody will confess to the crime? Surely the owner of the internet connection is the only sensible choice, just like, if you're caught by a speed camera, the registered owner of the car will be prosecuted if nobody else admits to being the driver.
If the car's number plate is dirty or otherwise obscured, should all owners of a similar make and colour of car be prosecuted because they don't know who was driving? When a car is stolen is the legal owner of the car responsible for anything that is done with that car while it is stolen?

If you're caught by a speed camera there is a photo that will often show the driver's face. Proving guilt should always be a requirement before punishing anyone. If you can't prove who is guilty you obviously have no evidence.
mr ploppy is offline   Reply With Quote