Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
Yes, that was the point I was making. Should a person become immune from prosecution if they leave their WiFi unsecured? That is what some people appear to be suggesting, and I can't see the rational behind that.
|
They shouldn't be immune from prosecution, but before they are prosecuted there should be evidence that they are guilty. Just like with every other crime except terrorism.
If you look at the number of false positives ACS Law had, think how many there will be when it is all automated at the ISP level (which is the only feasible way to do it without internet subscriptions doubling).