View Single Post
Old 03-25-2011, 03:25 PM   #63
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by spellbanisher View Post
A 2000 dollar tax would be excessive, but your reasoning that a tax would discourage creative activity is not sound. How does allowing an artist to profit from works created twenty, thirty, forty, or fifty years later encourage creative production?
You don't think that knowing that I can profit from something I create today for the next twenty, thirty, ... years would encourage me to produce something?
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote