View Single Post
Old 03-25-2011, 02:28 PM   #71
mr ploppy
Feral Underclass
mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mr ploppy's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,622
Karma: 26821535
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Yorkshire, tha noz
Device: 2nd hand paperback
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
For a civil case, the burden of proof is "on the balance of probabilities", rather than "beyond reasonable doubt".
Either way, in the recent ACS Law case a judge who specialises in copyright cases ruled that an IP address alone isn't enough evidence of guilt (or even probable guilt). And since an IP address is the only "evidence" required by this new law, it seems obvious to me what the intention of the BPI was when they helped to write it.
mr ploppy is offline   Reply With Quote